TW: sexual assault. An insurer claimed it did not have to cover an insured bus company because there was only an incidental connection between the victim's injuries and the bus's use as a vehicle.

An insurer's duty to contribute to another insurer's defense of a mutual client centered on whether the client had knowledge of the occurrences in the underlying suit.

The three judges were divided over whether the waiver of the insurer's right to subrogation did or did not discharge the underlying tort liability against the defendant.

Ozy executives may be covered by D&O insurance despite impersonating Youtube executives with potential Ozy investors.

Ozy executives may be covered by D&O insurance despite impersonating Youtube executives with potential Ozy investors.

The judges of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania pointed out that, while "coverage" refers to a specific risk included by an insurance policy, "reimbursement" means paying someone back for money already spent.

Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a lengthy opinion in In Re McDonald's Corporation Stockholder Derivative…

The judges of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals have affirmed a ruling from the Southern District of New Jersey that found a shipping company failed…

The justices of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island had to decide whether the policy definition of "pollutant" was ambiguous

The debate before the Sixth Circuit rested on a single difference in opinion: were the damages sought in the opioid suits against Quest "because of bodily injury" under the policies from Motorists and Westfield?