Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. He may be contacted at [email protected].
A Washington appeals court, affirming a trial courts decision, has decided that a case alleging road rage did not allege an accident as required for coverage under either a homeowners-insurance policy or an auto-insurance policy.
An Arizona appellate court ruled that the prohibited dog exclusion in a policy's animal-liability endorsement barred coverage for negligence claims against an insured when he failed to inform a plaintiff bitten by his pit bull whether the dog had received rabies shots.
A court in California has ruled that the state did not have a sufficient interest in a workers compensation claim filed by a professional basketball player who had played only one game in California and, therefore, it could not apply Californias workers compensation law to the players claim.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has upheld the dismissal of a subrogation action brought by insurance companies against the entities that designed, built, operated, and maintained 7 World Trade Center in Manhattan.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has upheld the dismissal of a subrogation action brought by insurance companies against the entities that designed, built, operated, and maintained 7 World Trade Center in Manhattan.
West Virginias highest court has ruled the term collapse as used in a homeowners insurance policy was ambiguous and meant something less than complete falling in of a kitchen floor.
West Virginias highest court has ruled the term collapse as used in a homeowners insurance policy was ambiguous and meant something less than complete falling in of a kitchen floor.
A federal appeals court has ruled an insurance carrier that provided an insurance professionals' E&O liability insurance policy to an agency is not obligated to defend the agency in a suit brought by a competitor agency.
A central New Jersey husband and wife who ran a now-defunct insurance brokerage firm have pleaded guilty to their roles in a scheme to steal more than $770,000 by failing to remit insurance premiums to seven insurance companies.
A central New Jersey husband and wife who ran a now-defunct insurance brokerage firm have pleaded guilty to their roles in a scheme to steal more than $770,000 by failing to remit insurance premiums to seven insurance companies.