NOT FOR REPRINT
Page Printed from: propertycasualty360.com/author/profile/kelly-helton-jd
Sign In To follow
After a storm damaged his lakeside deck and boat dock, the insured believed he was entitled to a higher claim payment than he received.
A minor drank to the point of intoxication at a bar in Florida and was later killed by a train.
The Maryland case deals with the extent of coverage available under an additional insured endorsement.
When a business sustains a loss to multiple locations for the same occurrence, does coverage applied per occurrence or per location?
Both a church and its governing evangelical association were found vicariously liable for injuries caused by a pastor who was acting in the scope of his employment.
An insurer who provided both primary and excess coverage refused to pay primary coverage for an insured who was also covered by an underlying policy.
The court found the potential for coverage because the policy applied to two structures on the same undivided parcel.
A worker fell and hit his head on scaffolding erected on a trailer attached to a covered vehicle.
The 'locations not insured' exclusion had an exception for residence employees injured while working at a premises other than the primary residence.
The policyholder argued that New Jersey law recognizes bicyclists as 'pedestrians' for purposes of no-fault coverage.