A question dealing with contracts, policy provisions and edition dates.

"The trial court found that the plaintiffs satisfied their burden of establishing ... that the false imprisonment arose out of the defendant's business pursuits, and that the business pursuits exclusion bars coverage," the opinion said.

This article provides an overview of parametric insurance.

The question before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts was whether a personal injury suit arising out of a single push by an insured was "abuse" within the meaning of the abuse and molestation exclusion in the insured's homeowners policy.

The justices of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts debated whether a single instance of conduct by an insured qualified as "abuse" that would be excluded from coverage under a homeowners policy.

We are starting to see an influx of claims where the loss report states the plumbing backed up into the sinks, showers, and/or toilets. Some of these claims…

The justices were guided by a 2020 decision related to an identical Dorchester Mutual Insurance policy where the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts had found the term "physical abuse" as used in the policy exclusion was ambiguous.

This is the third in a series of articles analyzing the FloodFlash parametric flood insurance policy available now in California, Texas, Louisiana, Florida and Virginia. This article discusses the making a claim, other party at fault, and cancellation sections of the policy.

When a man tries to add himself to an accident scene, witnesses turn him in.

A unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that a city's participation in a state insurance fund does not trigger liability coverage under a policy issued by Star Insurance Company.