Liquor liability exclusion unambiguously precluded insurer's duty to defend a club against negligence claims of motorist injured by patron who became inebriated at the club, says Indiana Supreme Court.

The Indiana Supreme Court ruled that a liquor liability exclusion unambiguously precluded any duty to defend a suit in which an injured motorist alleged that a bar had negligently allowed a customer to become inebriated.

A New Orleans restaurant will be allowed to proceed with an insurance lawsuit after the court found a plausible ambiguity in the applicable insurance policy.

The Supreme Court complied with recommendations from the Solicitor General and declined to take the medical marijuana reimbursement case into consideration.

According to a Verizon report, "[t]he major change this year with regard to action types was Ransomware coming out like a champ and grabbing third place in breaches (appearing in 10% of them, more than doubling its frequency from last year)."

A split-usage personal auto model would account for the split role a car operator plays, shifting between driver and technical supervisor.

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.

Assembly Bill 2188 would prohibit employers from discriminating against workers and job applicants for off-duty marijuana use.

The Missouri woman sued Geico claiming that she contracted a sexually transmitted disease from the car owner after the two had sex inside a car covered by the insurer.

In February this year, the families of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre reached a $73 million settlement with gun manufacturer Remington and its four insurers.