Sub-sections:
This case discusses whether an excluded auto claim invalidates the entire policy in the context of applying a coverage extension from another policy.
This case discusses breach, bad faith, negligence, and contributory negligence relating to a homeowners coverage dispute over whether Coverage A or Coverage B applies to property damage.
This case examines whether a policy's liquor liability exclusion precludes coverage for a negligence claim against a bar for allowing an inebriated minor to leave the premises.
Can the physical rupture of a water main be considered an ensuing loss from subsurface pressurized water?
This case deals with the extent of coverage available under an additional insured endorsement.
This case discusses how and when business interruption coverage is triggered under a BOP policy.
This case examines whether water accumulated on a roof is or is not considered 'surface water' under Massachusetts law.
In this case, the determination of coverage involves whether or not an additional insured is entitled to a duty to defend when a third-party is injured.
A trucking company argued that part of the damages the court had ordered the company to pay were not compensable.
A man sought coverage for removing methamphetamine residue from his rental property after his tenant smoked methamphetamine indoors.