Why compliance isn't enough to stop today's cyberattacks

Hackers use more multi-tiered tactics to exploit new vulnerabilities and evade detection.

Organized crime groups motivated by financial gain have professionalized their operations and often mimic legitimate business structures. (Credit: Przemek Klos/stock.adobe.com)

The digital battlefield is constantly shifting. As businesses fortify their defenses, hackers develop ever more sophisticated tactics to bypass them.

Phishing scams are becoming more convincing, zero-day vulnerabilities are multiplying, and ransomware attacks are crippling organizations. This evolving threat landscape demands a proactive approach to cybersecurity, compliance just isn’t enough anymore.

The evolving threat landscape

In this digital world, the threat landscape is evolving faster than ever, and businesses face more complex challenges. Hackers use more multi-tiered tactics to exploit new vulnerabilities and evade detection as companies scramble to bolster their defenses.

One of the biggest changes in recent years has been the rise of social engineering attacks. Phishing and spear phishing attacks now use advanced psychological manipulation techniques, making them harder to detect. These attacks are often the entry point for more serious breaches.

At the same time, zero-day vulnerabilities are being exploited more and more. These unknown security flaws give attackers a big advantage; they can breach systems before patches are developed and deployed. The race between attackers finding these vulnerabilities and defenders patching them has never been more intense. Unsurprisingly, it’s putting immense pressure on security teams.

Supply chain attacks have also become a massive issue. By attacking less secure third-party vendors, attackers can get into multiple organizations simultaneously, making one breach affect many more. These dynamics are why vendor risk management is more important than ever.

Most alarming, ransomware attacks have skyrocketed, from just encrypting data to sophisticated extortion schemes involving data theft and public exposure threats. These can bring organizations to their knees, resulting in huge financial loss and reputational damage.

Lastly, organized crime groups motivated by financial gain have professionalized their operations and often mimic legitimate business structures. And highly skilled individual hackers are still able to cause big disruption.

The role of compliance in cybersecurity

Compliance standards like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS set the baseline security practices for organizations. These frameworks protect sensitive data, privacy, and industry-specific security standards. While compliance has many benefits, including legal protection and a foundation for security hygiene, we need to acknowledge its limitations in the face of modern-day cyber threats.

One of the biggest limitations of compliance is its static nature. While threats evolve fast, compliance standards need to catch up. For example, these standards are infrequently updated and sometimes don’t address emerging risks. This gap can give organizations a false sense of security if they view compliance as the end goal rather than the starting point.

Also compliance often focuses on process over outcome. Organizations may tick boxes and complete required procedures without actually improving real-world security. This checkbox mentality can lead to a superficial approach to cybersecurity that doesn’t address an organization’s unique risk profile.

The one-size-fits-all approach of many compliance frameworks makes this worse. While these standards provide a baseline, they may not address the specific risks of individual organizations, leaving critical vulnerabilities unaddressed.

Finally, many compliance standards focus on detection and response rather than prevention. While these are important, an overemphasis on post-breach activities can distract from preventing attacks in the first place.

While compliance is part of cybersecurity, it should be seen as a foundation, not a solution. Organizations need to go beyond compliance to build dynamic risk-based security strategies that address their unique needs and the ever-changing threat landscape.

Having a proactive cybersecurity strategy is key in today’s threat landscape. Here are some points to consider:

Jonathan Selby

In this ever-shifting digital landscape, compliance alone is a failing defense — building a proactive cybersecurity strategy is essential to staying ahead of evolving threats.

Jonathan Selby is a risk management expert and tech industry leader at Founder Shield. Jonathan spent the first five years of his professional insurance career working as a generalist broker at a traditional firm on Long Island. Intrigued by how to leverage technology in the industry, he joined the Founder Shield team in 2016 and quickly grew into his current leadership role of Tech Industry Leader. 

See also: