According to the Maryland Supreme Court, According to the Maryland Supreme Court, "a party is entitled to prejudgment interest as a matter of right where the obligation to pay and the amount due are 'certain, definite, and liquidated by a specific date prior to judgment,'" Credit: mojo_cp/Stock.adobe.com

After concluding that Meridian Security Insurance Co. had a duty to indemnify an Anne Arundel County couple in an underlying trespass and nuisance lawsuit involving a neighbor, a Maryland federal judge further held that the insurer was responsible for prejudgment interest of $35,000, starting from the date of each attorney invoice.

U.S. District Judge Julie R. Rubin for the District of Maryland partially granted and partially denied Louis P. Batstone and Griffith R.D. Batstone's motion for summary judgment on liquidated damages in a Feb. 14 opinion, after previously granting their motion for partial summary judgment regarding their breach-of-contract claim, and ordering that Meridian had a duty to defend them in an underlying lawsuit filed in Anne Arundel County Circuit Court.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor