The way related claims or acts are defined can vary greatly from one policy to the next. (ALM Media archives)
Editor's note: This is the second of a two-part series discussing the significance of "related" claims under directors and officer (D&O) and other claims-made liability policies.
Part one of this series explained the importance of "related" claims and surveyed two recent federal cases that examined relatedness. This article delves into why these decisions are important by examining the landscape of relatedness decisions and highlighting several key points for policyholders to keep in mind as they navigate this intricate and fact-specific legal domain.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
