The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts has ruled that an insurer does not owe contribution to another insurer for the underlying defense of a mutual client because the first insurer is not obligated to defend the underlying suit. The case is Arch Specialty Ins. Co. v. Colony Ins. Co., 590 F. Supp. 3d 395 (D. Mass. 2022).
The underlying case
Two tenants sued the Board of Governors of Glover Landing Condo Trust (the Board), alleging the Board's failure to make necessary repairs had forced them to vacate their apartment, which they had owned since 1982. That complaint was based primarily on the Board's failure to approve code-compliant replacements for faulty, non-code-compliant windows and the failure to repair the roof, which leaked into the tenant's apartment. The tenants brought up the issues of non-code-compliant windows and the leaking roof multiple times, with flooding causing significant problems in 2007, 2011, and 2014. These problems were not fixed, and they continued until the tenants vacated the apartment in February 2015.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.