Mercer County Superior Court Judge R. Brian McLaughlin said: "This is not a dog-bite case despite the fact that a dog bite is part of the subject matter of this litigation." Credit: Gabriel Cassan/Adobe Stock
The doctrine of parental immunity doesn't protect a dog owner from sharing liability for a vicious attack on his own child, a New Jersey appeals court ruled.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Charles Toutant
Charles Toutant is a litigation writer for the New Jersey Law Journal.
