Photo: Don Landwehrle/Adobe Stock
Should tractor classification in farmers' insurance policies be taken from the language of the policy itself or existing case law? That is the question Freeman Mathis & Gary attorney Philip Savrin brought to the Georgia Court of Appeals in oral arguments on Thursday on behalf of Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance.
The plaintiff-appellee, a farming company, originally sued Nationwide, seeking a declaration that their insurance policy provided uninsured motorist (UM) coverage for an accident involving one of their tractors, which they contend was insured for liability under the policy and because they never rejected such coverage in writing.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
