(Credit: PhotoSpirit/Adobe Stock)
Attorneys battling before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court over the validity of "regular use" exclusions in uninsured and underinsured coverage policies agreed on one thing—a lot is riding on the justices' ruling.
The high court heard oral arguments Tuesday over whether Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law prohibits UM/UIM policies from excluding coverage for vehicles a policyholder regularly uses but does not own or insure.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Aleeza Furman
Aleeza Furman is a Philadelphia-based litigation reporter with The Legal Intelligencer. Contact her at [email protected].
