Tighter marketing budget? Time to re-evaluate auto insurance KPIs

Take a lesson from savvy insurance marketers and use this period of change to realign.

The auto insurance industry continues to spend less on advertising year-over-year. (Kalyakan/AdobeStock)

Proficiency in metrics and data analysis is an essential skill for auto insurance marketers, but even some of the savviest marketers are using the wrong KPIs to measure success.

Over the past year, top auto insurers significantly reduced their marketing budgets, and reports indicate the auto insurance industry continues to spend less on advertising year-over-year. Industry veterans have seen this play out before. Budgets get tight, executives panic and the next thing you know, marketing is the first line item to see major cuts.

So, this isn’t the first time marketers have been asked to do more with less. But this time around, many are looking for a more permanent solution — something that helps them prove their value in both good and bad economic conditions, and over the long term.

In today’s economic climate, auto insurance marketers have an opportunity to turn the current downturn into an upswing. But it will require them to redefine success through better KPIs and realign their marketing strategies accordingly.

The problem with traditional auto insurance KPIs

Most auto insurance marketing campaigns are measured using a combination of metrics that tell the story of customer quotes and binds. But this strategy is akin to judging a car’s value based on the number of miles on the odometer and nothing else.

That’s not to say traditional metrics aren’t useful. Although binds and other data will always have a place, these types of metrics ignore calculating or even estimating the lifetime value (LTV) of the prospect.

Of course, lifetime value has always been tricky in auto insurance. How do you predict what a customer you’re about to insure will really cost/? Zip codes? Car type? These are incredibly unreliable — and in some cases biased — predictors of whether someone will file a claim or not.

Consider this scenario…

Driver A is an excellent, low-risk driver, while Driver B is a dangerous, high-risk driver. A carrier not optimizing for LTV spends the same amount of money to acquire both Driver A and Driver B — let’s say $500 each — and considers both efforts a success.

However, that’s not the full picture. Driver B’s dangerous habits mean their LTV is actually negative (-$1,000), While Driver A has a positive LTV ($3,000). A carrier using LTV as the KPI understands that acquiring Driver A nets a $2,500 profit, while acquiring Driver B leads to $1,500 in losses. They understand that even if they have to spend more to acquire Driver A, it’s worth it.

Readjusting metrics, especially those that have historically dictated the success of insurance marketing campaigns, can seem daunting and painful. But the alternative — weathering yet another downturn with the same metrics — is worse.

Pivoting to a longer-term measure of success

Targeting to optimize for LTV of customers is a proven strategy, but what does it take to put it into action? Here’s how marketing teams can start to transition toward this more relevant and effective type of measurement in an organization.

Is it possible to endure another period of economic uncertainty using the same old KPIs? Take a lesson from savvy insurance marketers and use this period of change to realign. Start targeting safer drivers, prepping executives and re-aligning how success is measured. During the next downturn, marketers who follow this advice will find themselves in a more confident and comfortable position.

Jen Gold is director of Product Marketing at Arity.

See also: