A Connecticut Appellate Court panel affirmed the decision of the Compensation Review Board to uphold the Workers' Compensation commissioner for the Eighth District's determination that a per diem employee was not entitled to full salary disability benefits.
The plaintiff, George Kelly, argued that the commissioner's decision should not have relied on a supersedence appendix and cost sheet for "substantive purposes" and failed to assign the burden of proving the plaintiff was not entitled to benefits to the defendant, the opinion said.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.