The insurer deems captive agents independent contractors, but a class action suit alleges these agents are actually employees. (Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM) The insurer deems captive agents independent contractors, but a class action suit alleges these agents are actually employees. (Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)

The question of whether captive agents are independent contractors or employees of an insurance company is at the heart of a class action lawsuit filed against several Geico companies in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

The suit alleges that although the insurer "may call its insurance agents independent contractors, they do not treat them as such," as the financial and management structure between the company and its captive agents are more in line for those classified as employees. The suit, which was filed on behalf of a Geico captive agent located in Northeast Ohio, claims the company employs hundreds of captive agents across all 50 states.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Steve Hallo

Steve Hallo is managing editor of PropertyCasualty360.com. He can be reached at [email protected]