A gavel sits on a desk. In the opinion Justice Kevin Jewell delivered Thursday, he noted that consequential damages are those that result naturally, but not necessarily, from the defendant's breach. (Credit: Aerial Mike/Adobe Stock)

A Houston appeals court remanded a case for reconsideration of damages involving a dispute over insurance coverage that arose from a workplace death.

A key issue raised had to do with refereeing claims over whether damages were consequential or direct—something the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals recognized in its opinion is not well defined in Texas caselaw.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Adolfo Pesquera

Adolfo Pesquera, based in San Antonio, covering Texas courts. Contact at [email protected]. On Twitter: @Adolfo_PEZ