The Starrs  filed a 2018 petition for arbitration with the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulations, which alleged they "had to endure continued and severe noise and acoustical problems" from the fitness center, according to the lawsuit. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons/ GhoziSeptiandri)

A lawsuit that pits insurance underwriters against a Florida condo association raises questions about how insurance contracts should be interpreted. It examines whether disruption from a noisy gym counts as property damage under a commercial general liability policy, which defines "property damage" as "physical injury to tangible property."

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Melea VanOstrand

Melea VanOstrand oversees the Daily Business Review as ALM's Florida Bureau Chief. Email Melea at [email protected] or follow her on her Twitter or Facebook pages.