The complaint dedicates significant space to discussing the physical attributes of the virus, its means of transmission and the damage that it can cause. (Credit: Kevin Burkett/ Wikimedia Commons) The complaint dedicates significant space to discussing the physical attributes of the virus, its means of transmission and the damage that it can cause. (Credit: Kevin Burkett/ Wikimedia Commons)

Could the loss of use of a property due to the COVID-19 pandemic be considered "direct physical loss or damage?" An NBA team's dispute over denied insurance coverage is exploring the question.

The Philadelphia 76ers and SPF Owner LLC, which owns a 76ers training complex and office building in New Jersey, say the term should apply to damage caused by the pandemic. They are seeking declaratory judgment to reflect that interpretation after the Hartford Fire Insurance Co. declined to compensate them for lost income under the reasoning that the disease "does not constitute direct physical loss or damage."

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Aleeza Furman

Aleeza Furman is a Philadelphia-based litigation reporter with The Legal Intelligencer. Contact her at [email protected].