The insurance company argued that "the general rule against using pleas of nolo contendere can be adequately safeguarded by simply enforcing that rule in [the victim's] civil action before the Superior Court," and "excluding proof of Tenn's (an insured person in the case) 'nolo contendere' plea will allow him to benefit from his own illegal conduct." (Credit: GoodStudio)
The Connecticut Supreme Court concluded that a "no contest plea" in a criminal case cannot be used by an insurance company to deny coverage under a policy's criminal acts exclusion.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Allison Dunn
Allison Dunn is a reporter on ALM's Rapid Response desk based in Ohio, covering impactful litigation filings and rulings, emerging legal trends, controversies in the industry, and everything in between. Contact her at [email protected]. On Twitter: @AllisonDWrites.
