Biometric information includes an individual's details such as fingerprints, voiceprints, facial scans or retinal scans; and privacy laws protect how the information is collected, used or stored by an entity. (Photo: Konstantin Postumitenko/stock.adobe.com)
In West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., [2021 IL 125978] the Illinois Supreme Court held that West Bend owed a duty to defend its insured, a tanning salon, against a class-action lawsuit alleging the salon violated the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The Court found that the duty to defend was owed due to the language of the insured's business owner's policy, which provided coverage for lawsuits alleging "personal injury" or "advertising injury." The ruling could have significant ramifications for carriers given the growing prevalence of BIPA class-action lawsuits and the resulting settlements.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
