AFM moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the government order closing Mohawk Gaming did not trigger the civil authority provision of the policy. The district court agreed. In granting the insurer's motion, however, the court made two errors. (Credit: Chansom Pantip/Shutterstock) AFM moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the government order closing Mohawk Gaming did not trigger the civil authority provision of the policy. The district court agreed. In granting the insurer's motion, however, the court made two errors. (Credit: Chansom Pantip/Shutterstock)

Affiliated Factory Mutual Insurance Co. (AFM) was recently awarded judgment in a COVID-19-related business interruption claim heard before the Northern District of New York. In doing so, the court followed in the footsteps of other federal courts across the country when it failed to consider all parts of the policy as required by state law and made fact determinations at the Rule 12(c) pleading stage.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.