In this case, the insurer owed no duty to defend the insured under not one but two separate exclusions. The habitual new construction exclusion mirrors the typical "your products" and "your work" exclusions in traditional CGL policies, including the ISO policy. (Credit: VCNW/Shutterstock.com) In this case, the insurer owed no duty to defend the insured under not one but two separate exclusions. The habitual new construction exclusion mirrors the typical "your products" and "your work" exclusions in traditional CGL policies, including the ISO policy. (Credit: VCNW/Shutterstock.com)

Upholding a lower court's decision, a federal appeals court ruled an insurer is not obligated to defend a land developer charged with negligent design and construction under exclusions in its policies.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Coverage & Policy Issues
Litigation
Commercial Lines