Williams sued Aqueous Vapor for his injuries and the company sought coverage under its commercial insurance policy with Scottsdale, who denied coverage, citing the policy's products-completed operations hazard exclusion.(Credit: FOTOGRIN/Shutterstock.com) A consumer sued Aqueous Vapor for his injuries after an e-cigarette battery exploded in his pocket. The company sought coverage under its commercial insurance policy with Scottsdale Insurance Co., who denied coverage, citing the policy's products-completed operations hazard exclusion.  (Credit: FOTOGRIN/Shutterstock.com)

Scottsdale Insurance Company, an excess and surplus lines insurer, does not have to defend a suit brought against e-cigarette retailer Aqueous Vapor by a customer who suffered severe burns after e-cigarette batteries exploded in his pocket, according to a ruling by The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Litigation
Commercial Lines
E&S/Specialty