What insurance pros should know about MGA regulation

Here is a brief review of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners model act on MGAs.

MGAs allow for specialized, often sector-specific, insurance underwriting expertise in a carrier’s portfolio. (Photo: Jiw Ingka for Shutterstock)

The insurance marketplace is seeing an increase in the use and popularity of managing general agents, or MGAs, also known as managing general underwriters (MGUs).

MGAs write business through comprehensive “programs” under which the MGA is responsible for underwriting and administration, in addition to placing the business with the carrier. Growth in premiums written through program business exceeded that of the total property & casualty market by 32% in 2016, a trend that has continued since then into 2019, according to Conning.

MGAs (also known colloquially as program managers) and the use of programs allow for specialized, often sector-specific, insurance underwriting expertise in a carrier’s portfolio of risks. In so doing, they allow insurance carriers to deploy capital and premium-writing capacity on a customized basis. With expertise in particular sectors, MGAs perform the critical underwriting, pricing and administrative functions needed for profitable results in writing insurance to specialized businesses such as transportation, shipping, mining, retail vendors, construction, agriculture and numerous others. MGAs earn variable commissions based on business profitability, giving them “skin in the game,” and often offer claims handling and reinsurance placement in their suite of services.

A brief review of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners model act on MGAs highlights features and activities of these market participants that may have relevance for regulators. Most states have adopted some version of the NAIC model or an analogous statute or regulation. The discussion below of certain key features of the NAIC model is not a substitute for a description of any state’s particular law.

Defining MGA

The model law defines “managing general agent” as any person that:

An MGA also adjusts or pays claims in excess of $10,000 per claim or negotiates reinsurance on behalf of the insurer.

The NAIC observes in a drafting note: “Individuals or agents calling themselves ‘managing general agents’ may not necessarily fall under the provisions of this Act. In other words, if the individual or agent does not perform the activities set forth in [the definition of MGA], for purposes of the Act, the individual is not an MGA.”

A program manager that neither handles claims nor brokers reinsurance does not fall under the MGA definition and thus would not be regulated as an MGA.

Licensing

The model law requires a person to be licensed as an insurance producer in the adopting state if either the underlying risk is located, and the insurer is licensed in the state, or the insurer is domiciled in the state and risks are located outside the state. That is, an MGA can be required to be licensed as a producer in a state where it has no presence and conducts no activity, as long as the insurer for which it is writing premium is domiciled in the state.

Most states do not provide for a distinct “MGA license” but rather impose a producer licensing requirement on agents or brokers meeting the statutory threshold. However, at least one state, Oregon, requires that a person may not act as an MGA unless the person has a producer’s license that is “indorsed to authorize the person” to so act. Other states may have similar idiosyncratic licensing requirements.

Minimum contractual provisions

An MGA must have a written contract with the insurer for which it acts. An insurer engaging a program manager, where the program manager might not immediately fall under the MGA definition in a given state, may nonetheless want to make sure that the contract with that program manager contain these provisions so that amendments will not be necessary if and when the manager trips the thresholds.

According to the NAIC model law, an MGA agreement must have at least the following provisions:

Duties of insurers

According to the model law, the insurer is required to have on file an independent audited annual financial statement or reports for the two most recent fiscal years (or, if the MGA has been in existence less than two years, monthly financials certified by an officer) that “prove that the MGA has a positive net worth.”

If an MGA establishes loss reserves, the insurer must annually obtain the opinion of an actuary attesting to the adequacy of loss reserves established for losses incurred and outstanding on business produced by the MGA. The insurer must periodically (at least semi-annually) conduct an on-site review of the underwriting and claims processing operations of the MGA. Binding authority for all reinsurance contracts or participation in insurance or reinsurance syndicates must rest with an officer of the insurer, who shall not be affiliated with the MGA.

Within 30 days of entering into or terminating a contract with an MGA, the insurer must provide written notification to the state insurance commissioner, together with a statement of duties which the MGA is expected to perform on behalf of the insurer, the lines of insurance for which the MGA is to be authorized to act and any other information the commissioner may request. An insurer must review its books and records each quarter to determine if any producer has become an MGA. If the insurer determines that a producer has become an MGA, the insurer must promptly notify the producer and the insurance commissioner of such determination. The insurer and the producer/MGA will have 30 days to fully comply with the statute.

An insurer may not appoint to its board of directors an officer, director, employee, sub-producer or controlling shareholder of its MGAs (except where the insurer and MGA are affiliated, and thus covered by provisions of insurance law governing holding company groups).

Examination and enforcement authority

According to the model law, an MGA’s acts are considered to be the acts of the insurer on whose behalf it is acting, and an MGA may be examined as if it were the insurer. If the commissioner determines that the MGA or any other person has not materially complied with the statute, or any regulation or order promulgated thereunder, after notice and opportunity to be heard, the commissioner may order:

If the insurer is in rehabilitation or liquidation proceedings, and the receiver determines that the MGA or any other person has not materially complied with MGA laws, and the insurer suffered any loss or damage therefrom, the receiver may maintain a civil action for recovery of damages or other appropriate sanctions for the benefit of the insurer. The statute specifies that the provisions do not limit the applicability of other penalties that may be available under the insurance law.

Attorney Dan Rabinowitz (drabinowitz@kramerlevin.com) is head of the insurance practice at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP in New York.

Also by this contributor: Pandemic legislation: Lessons from the U.S. terrorism response