The case for more coverage transparency

Pandemic coverage disputes have created a challenge for insurance as well as an opportunity to quickly launch innovative new coverage options.

Parametric insurance covers a specific event that can trigger a claim payment based on metrics from a recognized source such as the Richter scale for earthquakes or the number of hours a plane is delayed. (ALM Media archives)

Sadly, insurance-focused news outlets, like this one, are starting to overflow with references to who is suing whom over certain types of coverage related to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a growing regulatory and legislative outcry for the insurance industry to pay out in instances where there is no specified coverage or where coverage is actually excluded. Both business and personal lines customers do not fully understand where they are (and are not) covered. It is a pretty dismal picture, and it is going to take a long time to sort it all out.

In the meantime, a growing trend provides a glimmer of hope in all this chaos: Parametric insurance.

Parametric insurance covers a specific event that can trigger a claim payment based on metrics from a recognized source such as the Richter scale for earthquakes or the number of hours a plane is delayed. While parametric insurance isn’t new — it has been available in emerging markets over the years — usage has been limited and sporadic.

During 2019, there were undoubtedly some launches of more mainstream products such as Swiss Re’s Quake Assist or Sompo’s flood coverage. More recently, however, there have been at least four notable launches or expansions:

The examples above are simply stated for brevity. But the scenarios are not that simple.

For instance, the Global Parametrics and Arbol offering also includes an ecosystem of related parties in the transaction. And Parsyl provides services and an extensive risk management system so that cargo and fleet owners can manage exposures.

From an education perspective, it is worth getting further details on all four scenarios. However, for purposes of this column, the particularly hopeful note is that all this has happened in one month, which means the cycle of innovation and response is speeding up.

Insurers and technology providers are coming together to find opportunities to create products that have specificity in terms of coverage and payment amounts. This is a very good thing!

Insurers need to continue to seek opportunities to innovate in this area. Clearly, not all product lines are appropriate for parametric policies. However, in more instances than not, bringing sensors, aerial imagery, weather data, and science to insurance products across all product segments can only help create transparency both in coverage creation and in loss settlement.

This needs to be a goal for all insurers.

Karen Pauli (kpauli@strategymeetsaction.com) is a principal at Strategy Meets Action, the strategic advisory firm delivering advice, consulting services and published research to insurers, solution providers and InsurTech startups. This piece published first in the SMA blog and is reproduced here with permission. These opinions are the author’s own.

Related: