Pennsylvania bill would define COVID-19 as property damage

The proposed legislation would require insurers to pay claims that standard property policies do not typically cover.

The Reading Terminal Market in Philadelphia sits empty on April 15 during business closures Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf imposed to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The market has since reopened to the public Monday through Saturday. (Photo: Hannah Yoon/Bloomberg)

The Pennsylvania Senate is weighing a bill that would include losses spurred by the COVID-19 global pandemic under property and business interruption insurance coverage.

Although SB. 1127, which was introduced on April 30, does not explicitly state that insurers must cover COVID-19 business interruption claims, it would require insurers to pay claims that standard property policies do not typically cover.

Specifically, the bill states that if a covered property is located within a municipality where “the presence of the COVID-19 coronavirus has otherwise been detected,” that property is “deemed to have experienced property damage.”

Coronavirus is deemed to be “detected” when at least one or more persons present in that municipality has been positively identified as having been infected by COVID-19.

The bill also states that Gov. Tom Wolf’s March 19 emergency order to close businesses is to be considered an order of civil authority under a first-party insurance policy which limits, prohibits, or restricts access to non-life-sustaining business locations “as a direct result of physical damage at or in the immediate vicinity of those locations.”

The bill would apply to all insurance policies that were active as of March 6, and would potentially constitute an interpretation of several key policy terms including “direct physical loss, damage, or injury to tangible property,” a term that has been the core of the majority of COVID-19 insurance complaints that have been filed thus far.

Related: