A Connecticut court has ruled that an automobile insurer may not exclude uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage for rental vehicles. (Photo: Shutterstock)
A Connecticut trial court has ruled that an automobile insurer may not exclude uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage for rental vehicles from an automobile liability insurance policy where the policy provides rental vehicle coverage as permitted — but not required — by Connecticut law.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
