In its decision, the district court found that the undisputed evidence showed that the wind-driven rain of Hurricane Irma had entered the property due to deterioration of the roof coverings and waterproofing sealants, deficient roof repairs, and a general lack of maintenance of the roof surface, as well as wear and tear, deterioration, and inadequate maintenance of window and door perimeter sealant and stucco finishes. (Photo: Alex Wroblewski/Bloomberg)
A federal district court in Florida has granted summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a case in which a property owner sought coverage for water damage to its building from Hurricane Irma.
|The case
GBS Investment Group asserted that property it owned in Miami had suffered water damage "due to a roof leak, caused by wind-driven rain." It notified its insurer, United Specialty Insurance Company, and sought coverage and payment for the damage in the amount of $175,045.01.
United Specialty retained an engineer, Estuardo Terraza, to inspect the property to determine the cause and extent of damage.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.