A federal district court in Oklahoma has ruled that a bank's insurance carrier did not have to defend or indemnify the bank in a lawsuit brought by a customer who was taken hostage by a bank robber and thereafter shot by law enforcement officers. (Photo: Shutterstock)
A federal district court in Oklahoma has ruled that a bank's insurance carrier did not have to defend or indemnify the bank in a lawsuit brought by a customer who was taken hostage by a bank robber and thereafter shot by law enforcement officers.
|The robbery
In 2016, an armed robber entered Bank of Eufaula, in Eufaula, Okla., while Julie Huff was there. He shot and killed the bank's president, and he shot a teller who resisted his demand for money. The robber then took Huff hostage at gunpoint, ordered her to drive him in a stolen vehicle, and forced her to take him several miles as he sat in the passenger seat with a gun pointed at her.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.