Norfolk city skyline and Elizabeth River, Virginia, USA. (Photo: Shutterstock)
An appellate court in New Jersey has ruled that an insured could not assert a property damage claim after its excavator fell into a river, concluding that the river had not been damaged.
|The case
Diaco Construction, Inc., lost an excavator in the Elizabeth River in the course of constructing concrete headwalls and outlets for stormwater runoff pursuant to its contract with the city of Elizabeth, New Jersey. As the appellate court explained, a Diaco employee was operating the excavator on the riverbank when he sensed it slipping into the river. The operator turned the machine and tried to drive it across the river, but the excavator got stuck three-quarters of the way across.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.