The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to excuse a juror in an insurance coverage case brought by a policy holder against her auto insurer based on evidence that the excused juror was "dangerous and disruptive." (Photo: Shutterstock)
A "dangerous and disruptive" juror was excused in an insurance coverage case brought by a policyholder against her auto insurer.
'Dangerous' juror
Lisa Bostick sought underinsured motorist benefits from her insurer, State Farm, denied her claim, and Bostick sued.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.