While photographs show what happened following an accident, a diagram can show pre-collision movement. (Photo: The Warren Group)

When it comes to diagramming a crash scene, there are several methods to complete the task. Forensic mapping, (locating, positioning and documenting the evidence of a collision scene to scale) is essential to having the answers to the questions, "who, what, where, when and why." Photographs do a great job of showing what the investigators saw post-collision, yet they lack scale and the ability to describe pre-collision movement. Having a computer-aided diagram (CAD) of the collision scene goes much further than pictures can; here is why.

Figure 1. (Photo: The Warren Group)

A scale diagram (Figure 1) gives the full overview of a collision scene from either a 2D or 3D point of view. Being able to see how things lined up, how they came together and how they parted helps explain the events within a crash. When a scene can be viewed from top down or any angle, that helps relay the facts. The investigator, judge or jury will get a visual idea of what was happening up to, at and after impact.

Figure 2. (Photo: The Warren Group)

Using properly documented physical evidence (Figure 2) in conjunction with the layout of the roadway in the area helps to tell the story from approach to final rest. Photographs limit the viewer to only seeing what was there in the aftermath and can also skew the perspective as to the position or distance captured within the frame.

Low-tech vs. high-tech

Using forensic mapping technology (a laser scanner, drone, total station or some other method of gathering data points for evidence) reduces time and adds detail that hand drawings lack. Gathering data by hand with a 100-foot tape measure takes time and being in the roadway is dangerous. The use of advanced technology reduces the time needed and simplifies the task of capturing the data as well as reduces the threat to an investigator.