Last month we began analyzing coverage issues affecting a school's actions in terms of disciplinary actions. First, the act would have had to be committed by or with the acquiescence of the insured — which might then trigger the "intentional act" exclusion — or be an act for which the insured might be vicariously responsible. Allegations that the school failed to prevent a third party from engaging in a named peril may not necessarily translate into coverage for the school.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now