This story is reprinted with permission from FC&&S Legal, the industry's only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.

|

CGL policy coverage

A federal district court in California has ruled that a commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy did not cover lawsuits against Yahoo! Inc. alleging that it had invaded the plaintiffs' privacy when it sent them unsolicited text messages.

From January 2013 to April 2014, several class action lawsuits (collectively, the “Text Message Litigations”) were filed against Yahoo as a result of Yahoo's alleged transmission of unsolicited text messages. These lawsuits alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227. The Text Message Litigations alleged that through the unsolicited transmission of the text messages, Yahoo had invaded the privacy of the plaintiffs.

Once the Text Message Litigations began, Yahoo notified National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, which had issued a CGL policy to Yahoo, to obtain coverage.

National Union denied coverage and Yahoo sued, alleging breach of contract.

National Union moved to dismiss, asserting that its policy did not cover the Text Message Litigations.

|

The National Union policy

Endorsement No. 1 to the National Union policy defined:

personal injury

as:

injury, including consequential “bodily injury”, arising out of one more of the following offenses: … (e) oral or written publication, in any manner, of material that violates a person's right of privacy.

|

Court sided with insurer

The court, applying California law, granted National Union's motion.

In its decision, the court explained that one meaning of the right to privacy was secrecy, which involved the right to prevent disclosure of personal information to third parties. In situations where secrecy privacy was violated, publication played a key role, the court added.

Here, the court reasoned, Yahoo allegedly made the text messages known to the recipients, but did not make the content of the text messages known to third parties — that is, there was no “publication.” Accordingly, the court found, the text messages did not violate a person's privacy right of secrecy and, therefore, National Union did not owe a duty to defend Yahoo for violations of seclusion privacy.

The court concluded that because Yahoo's claim for coverage possibly could be amended by the allegation of additional facts, or by other reasons, the court should not dismiss this case with prejudice, it granted leave for Yahoo to file an amended complaint.

The case is Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 17-cv-00447 NC (N.D. Cal. June 2, 2017).

Steven A. Meyerowitz, Esq., is the director of FC&S Legal, the editor-in-chief of the Insurance Coverage Law Report, and the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc. Email him at [email protected].

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.