This story is reprinted with permission from FC&&S Legal, the industry's only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
An appellate court in New Jersey, affirming a trial court's decision, has ruled that a lawyer could not compel an insurance company to retroactively provide professional liability coverage to him.
|Notice mailed
Vince A. Sicari, an attorney who operated his own law practice in New Jersey, obtained an insurance policy from The Harford Insurance Company of the Midwest effective July 31, 2010 through July 31, 2011 (the "2010 policy"). The 2010 policy included coverage for commercial general liability, business personal property liability and lawyers' professional liability. Sicari paid a premium of $2,728 for the 2010 policy.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
