The standard personal-auto policy offers uninsured motorists (UM) coverage to insureds; of course, there are exclusions that limit the scope of the coverage.
One of the more troublesome exclusions is one that states the insurer will not provide UM coverage for bodily injury sustained “by an insured while occupying, or when struck by, any motor vehicle owned by that insured which is not insured for this coverage under this policy.”
This exclusion—better known as the “owned-but-not-insured” exclusion—seems straightforward enough. If an insured is driving to the store in his 2012 Chevy and is hit by an uninsured motorist, then that insured cannot claim UM coverage for his bodily injuries under his auto policy if he has not purchased that particular coverage for the 2012 Chevy. However, as with most insurance policy language, the owned-but-not-insured exclusion is subject to judicial interpretation which can render the exclusion void and useless.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
