The problem was supposed to have been solved by passage last November by the full NAIC of a landmark model law that seeks to reduce reinsurance collateral requirements for non-U.S. reinsurers domiciled in qualified jurisdictions.

Apparently, however, NAIC action has not done the trick.

Industry lawyers and lobbyists familiar with McRaith's visit say they believe the U.S. will likely have to agree to some uniform collateral requirements for foreign insurers beyond the ability of the NAIC to enforce in order to facilitate an even playing field for U.S. insurers doing business in Europe.

McRaith issued a statement through the EIOPA after the meeting in which he said that “The insurance dialogue between the EU and the U.S. is critical to the promotion of transatlantic understanding and cooperation, and to the promotion of greater consistency and alignment in insurance regulation. We look forward to continuing our work with our EU counterparts and U.S. state regulators for the benefit of insurance consumer protection and business opportunity in both jurisdictions.”

The Treasury Department today declined to confirm any details of the meeting or McRaith's statement.

According to Gabriel Bernardino, chairman of EIOPA, the EU and the U.S have launched the talks in order to increase mutual understanding and cooperation with a view to identifying the main commonalities and differences of the two insurance regulatory and supervisory regimes.

Bernadino said the next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for October in Washington.

Meanwhile, rumors are circulating in official circles in Washington that the Obama administration will release over the August congressional recess the long-delayed report on insurance modernization that the FIO and McRaith have been working on.

Difficulties in cooperation between the FIO and the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) over who will primarily represent the U.S. on international insurance issues are delaying the report, according to industry lobbyists and officials.

Several insurance industry and federal officials say the USTR is objecting to the role the FIO envisions it will play in the future in negotiating international trade pacts. Sources declined to comment by name.

Industry officials, both property and casualty and life, want the Treasury Department to take the lead role in negotiating trade agreements with foreign countries.

That's because the FIO and top Treasury officials are developing an expertise on insurance issues and have also developed a mechanism for dialogue with state officials, who are the designated overseers of insurance.

The language establishing the FIO, crafted by House Financial Services Committee officials, originally called for the FIO/Treasury to have full authority to negotiate international trade pacts regarding insurance.

However, it was revised to establish joint authority when Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., then chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, objected to the original language, with the full support of the USTR.

The House Ways and Means Committee has jurisdiction over trade issues and the USTR. The language was changed to provide for a joint role before the bill was enacted by Congress in July 2010.

A source close to the USTR contends, “By statute, the Office of the United States Trade Representative is the lead authority regarding trade and investment matters, including with respect to insurance.”

The source adds that DFA “also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury and the USTR to jointly to negotiate and enter into bilateral or multilateral agreements regarding prudential matters with respect to the business of insurance or reinsurance.”

The anticipated FIO report was mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA), and was supposed to be released Jan. 21.