Last November, the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) proposed a new rule permitting agencies the use of disparate-impact analysis to prove allegations of illegal housing discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. HUD listed the provision and pricing of homeowners' insurance as one housing-related activity to which the disparate-impact standard would apply. How would the rule's adoption affect homeowner insurers and consumers?

Let's begin with some history: Congress enacted the Fair Housing Act in 1968 to prohibit housing discrimination based on race, religion, gender, familial status or ethnicity. The law was meant to put an end to restrictive covenants, in which homeowners' groups agree not to sell their homes to certain minorities. Likewise, the law prohibited landlords from refusing to rent apartments to people based on race, gender, et al., and prevented lenders from denying home mortgage loans or charging higher interest rates on the basis of these characteristics. Congress assigned HUD the task of enforcing the Act. 

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.