Brokers may be required to detail the sources of their compensation, according to a March 8 ruling by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York. In the matter of Sullivan Financial Group Inc. et al v. James J. Wrynn, Superintendent of Insurance, the courts stated that the New York Insurance Dept. was within its rights to issue a rule requiring disclosure of compensation.
Reaction to both the regulation and court decision has been mixed. It seems worthwhile to more closely examine differing viewpoints with respect to the court holding, and how the principles underlying the rule might generally apply to brokers and agents around the country.
Prior to the enactment of the rule at issue, the insurance department and New York State Office of the Attorney General performed a joint investigation, which revealed criminal bid-rigging and steering schemes involving insurers and producers. The investigation also demonstrated that insurance producers regularly receive incentive-based compensation from insurers, and that these payments influence producers' recommendations to their clients.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
