NU Online News Service, Feb. 13, 1:52 p.m. EST
If there wasn't enough tension between Allstate agents and the company already, a memo about a glitch in agents' compensation may have added some more fuel to the fire.
On Friday, agents were informed through an internal communication that there were problems with calculating their annual bonuses and incorrect information was reported on some agency owners' tax forms.
The company says in a statement that it is re-running the report “with additional checks and balances to ensure accuracy.”
The company says it anticipates agents will have their bonus payments delayed until Feb. 23, but under contract, Allstate has until March 15 to make the payments.
Maybe more annoying for an agent who has filed his or her taxes, information on Form 1099-MISC reported incorrect income information related to two incentive programs for some agency owners and processed income information to the wrong agent identification numbers for other agency owners.
Allstate says it will issue corrected forms and pay for any amended returns upon the agent's request.
“We regret any confusion, inconvenience or anxiety these recent process errors may have caused amongst some of our agency owners,” the company says.
The issue affects 4,700 agency owners, the company says, out of a total of 11,500.
While expressing reluctance to add more fuel to the fire on what is in some quarters an already contentious relationship between agents and the company, Jim Fish, executive director of the National Association of Professional Allstate Agents, says the association does plan to ask whether any agency owner terminations took place based on inaccurate information aggregated by Allstate's systems.
A spokeswoman for Allstate says overall information is correct and that the errors related only to the bonus payments. She adds that the termination of any agent is a very long and involved process and would not be based solely upon the aggregated data.
This latest development follows a recent survey released by NAPAA earlier this month of 1,800 agents finding that the overall satisfaction with the company was not very high.
NAPAA says 73 percent of agents who took the survey say they were “not very” or “not at all” satisfied with their relationship with theNorthbrook, Ill.-based insurer.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.