Data can be communicated to a remote service center or a hand-held device, and further, the remote service center can interactively control the appliance via the central collector. Some examples include: a stove with a built-in stirrer remotely controlled and an ingredient dispenser controlled by a wireless device and a sensor that monitors the cook top pan remotely.

Additional household appliances subject to remote monitoring are washing machines, dryers, dishwashers, refrigerators, freezers, toasters, blenders, mixers, food processors, coffee makers, and so on. The user can be notified by his hand-held device with alerts about the products being monitored. For a fee, the appliances can also be monitored by the manufacturer to include failures diagnoses.

The Thought Police
Just like the thought police in "1984," major companies such as LG, General Electric, and Panasonic implement accelerated smart technology in their products. In fact, LG now offers appliances with THINQ Technology which permits "smart" washers and dryers, ovens, stoves, vacuums, dishwashers, and refrigerators to be Wi-Fi controlled, and to include smart metering. This new technology collects critical information about the appliances' performances that needs to be evaluated for subrogation recovery. Further, LG offers a Smart Diagnosis program that allegedly notices when something goes wrong in a home appliance and issues alerts on the product's display panel. This program will soon offer Wi-Fi appliance alerts to consumers.

Panasonic unveiled its own energy smart product line called ECONAVI, which features 30 new appliances, including refrigerators, washers, air conditioners, microwaves, bread makers, rice cookers, and so on. These products were developed to monitor a user's living environment and adjust usage accordingly. They also collect valuable data about the product and its environment, which is an important part of any subrogation investigation involving product losses.

GE also offers a Nucleus Energy Manager, which includes a programmable thermostat, washer, dryer, and dishwasher. The program manager collects real-time information about energy use in the home, providing vital data about the circumstances occurring at or near the time of a loss. These home energy management systems offer different levels of energy monitoring and control over home appliances.

Vehicle EDR Data and Legislative Action
In Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Texas, Virginia, and Washington, state laws have been enacted related to EDRs in vehicles. State statutes have been ratified based on consumer complaints about companies obtaining vehicle data without the owner even knowing about it. Warrants have been issued in criminal cases in some states to access vehicle EDR data. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released a mandate on vehicle EDRs (47478-47489), providing a minimum standard for the data that EDRs collect. Fifteen types of vehicle crash data are required by the NHTSA. These include: pre-crash speed, engine throttle, brake use, measured changes in forward velocity, driver safety belt use, air bag warning lamp status, and air bag deployment times. 

Courts have been more willing to accept EDR information as a reliable source of empirical data. Recovered empirical data avoids the memory hole of oblivion when such product data is not recovered. Because of the expansion of EDRs into consumer household products other than vehicles, legislative action in states may be necessary to define the scope and access to an appliance's data.

Doublethink
In "1984," the term "doublethink" was euphemistically coined for simultaneously holding and believing contradictory beliefs. What EDR and smart technology may produce is empirical data that would ostensibly undercuts "doublethink" about what happened to a product involved in a failure subject to a subrogation investigation. The Whirlpool patent discussed above noted black box operational data could be used by insurance companies to assess the causes and effects of a destructive event. Physical evidence to include recoverable EDR smart technology data needs to be preserved after a loss event, and the value of that data will not be known until a complete subrogation investigation is completed. Recovered data needs to be properly secured and evaluated with other evidence, witness statements, available video/audio and other details, as part of any subrogation investigation. In addition, data may assist in establishing an area when a loss occurred as well as the cause of a loss.

As Isaac Asimov, an American science fiction author, is quoted as saying "The only constant is continuing change, inevitable change that is a dominant factor in society today." Claims adjusters must keep pace with smart technology advances in property claims relative to subrogation recovery issues, and they must also obtain and preserve available EDR information and smart technology data properly.