NU Online News Service, June 23, 9:55 a.m. EST
Owners of the New York Mets say they did not look into buying insurance coverage to protect their investments with Bernard L. Madoff, now convicted for running a Ponzi scheme.
Irving H. Picard, a trustee seeking money for Madoff’s victims via a $1 billion lawsuit, alleges that since Mets' owners Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz of Sterling Equities sought insurance in 2001 to protect investments with Madoff, they were on "inquiry notice" of the fraud, according to court papers filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York.
In a recent court filing by Sterling to answer the allegations as it tries to dismiss the lawsuit, Wilpon and Katz deny, as they have since the suit was filed late last year, that they knew Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme, and they say they "never 'shopped' for fraud insurance, never thought they needed fraud insurance, and never purchased fraud insurance for their [Madoff] investments."
Picard needs to establish not that Wilpon and Katz knew what Madoff was doing, but that they were presented with numerous warnings or signs of Madoff’s scheme, Picard states in court papers.
Picard alleges that Katz had a conversation with a business partner, Charles Klein of American Securities, about purchasing insurance for its own investment portfolio and recommended Sterling also look into it. The trustee says an executive with Sterling allegedly met with an insurance representative and reported back to Wilpon and Katz about what the executive termed as "Madoff insurance."
Previous depositions of Katz contradict Picard’s allegations, Sterling says. In a transcript included within Sterling's filing, an attorney asks Katz what he thought about the insurance idea after speaking with Klein.
"We weren’t going to buy insurance on something that we thought was as good as gold and a waste of money," Katz answers.
Sterling also looks to get pre-trial evidence from Picard, who must have spoken to Klein in order to develop his allegations against the Mets’ owners. Picard is "compelled" to come forward with this evidence but has "put forth no evidence from Mr. Klein…which suggests once again that he has no evidence to support his claim," Sterling says.
Sterling asserts that the “shopping spree” allegation “cannot carry the weight of the trustee’s billion-dollar demand.”
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.