“Come again?”

That's the thought that ran through my mind when I.I.I. President Dr. Robert Hartwig told a crowd of hundreds at last month's PLRB/LIRB Claims Conference that there have been double-digit reductions in claim departments over the last two years. Here's the statement that made my mental record needle scratch:

“We have seen a very sharp drop in the claim adjusting area, the sharpest drop of all P&C positions in percent terms, around 14 percent since the recession began in 2008,” said Hartwig. “I do not know precisely what the driver of this is at this point, but the number of people employed in the claim adjuster position today is roughly where it was in 1995.”

Keep in mind that, as Hartwig noted just prior to dropping this numerical bomb, the insurance industry as a whole contracted by just about five percent during the same period. The national average was 6.1 percent. Surely there must be some kind of “driver” taking place.

Instead of glossing over this oxymoronic “spike in reduction,” let's draw some of our own conclusions as to what might be driving the losses, as gleaned from responses to a similar question I posted in several claim-related groups in LinkedIn, as well as comments made by several industry sources.

It's the Economy, Stupid. People are driving less. Small businesses are dropping coverage, reducing staff, or closing their doors entirely. All of this has the effect of reducing claim-generating activity, such as the number of auto, workers' comp, and liability claims that carriers are reporting. This, in turn, affects the number of claim assignments. Fewer claims equal fewer adjusters.

Rise of the Desk Adjuster. Economics and improved automation/technology have led many carriers to rethink whether claim handling business intelligence could be built-in to applications and make handling claims via call center a viable option. These desk adjusters can handle more claims while also reducing ALAE and UALAE. Claims are settled more quickly, although the “nothing more, nothing less” aspect of the policy is likely to suffer, resulting in higher payouts. Insurers can make up for the higher claim payouts by increasing premiums. This isn't the case with allocated loss adjusting expenses.

Lack of Major Catastrophes. A storm surge isn't the only thing that rises during a busy hurricane season. A similar phenomenon occurs in the claim community, as the need for adjusters rises exponentially. When multiple storm seasons fail to materialize, as they have the last several years, once gainfully employed adjusters are forced to move on to greener pastures. It's a temporary flight and, like the swallows of Capistrano, they'll eventually return.

It's All a Mirage. The numbers only recognize formal adjusters, and therefore fail to reflect changing employment status of some professionals. Companies are hiring adjusters on a contract basis, who are essentially performing the work on the side. Therefore, they may or may not be counted among the adjuster ranks. This could affect the overall reporting of the figures. The claims are still occurring, and they're being handled by adjusters. They're just not being classified that way.

What do you think the reasons are behind the drop? Go to the article here to add your own thoughts and comments, and let the speculation begin.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.