Medicare’s Secondary Payer Statute (42 U.S.C. ?1395y) has existed in some form since the inception of the Medicare program in 1965. While the statute has been amended several times since then, the most significant amendments occurred in 1980, when the list of primary payers was expanded from workers’ compensation only to also include liability, automobile and no-fault insurance; and in 2007, when the Medicare, Medicaid, & SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA) imposed significant reporting requirements on workers’ compensation, liability and no-fault plans (including self-insured plans).

The 1980 revisions have, themselves, undergone changes over the years, but the following provision of the Medicare Secondary Payer statute has been in existence in substantially the same form since December 1980:

Payment under [Medicare] may not be made . . . with respect to any item or service to the extent that. . . (ii) payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under a workmen’s compensation law or plan of the United States or a State or under an automobile or liability insurance policy or plan (including a self-insured plan) or under no fault insurance.

CMS interprets this language as providing that any settlement that closes out future medical expenses in a claim against a primary payer represents a situation in which “payment has been made” for an item or service otherwise covered by Medicare, precluding future Medicare coverage for those items or services until the payment has been exhausted on future medical expenses related to the injury. This provision of the Secondary Payer Statute gave rise to the use of the first Medicare Set-Aside Arrangement (MSA) in a workers’ compensation settlement in 1995. This same provision also forms the basis for statements from several representatives of CMS over the past four years that Medicare’s interests as secondary payer must be reasonably considered in liability settlements, just as they must be in workers’ compensation settlements. As a result, the use of MSAs in liability settlements is becoming more and more common.

New Deadline Set The 2007 amendment to the Secondary Payer Statute, contained in Section 111 of the MMSEA, adds 42 U.S.C. ?1395y(b)(8), which imposes strict information reporting requirements on liability insurance plans, no-fault insurance plans and workers’ compensation plans, (including self-insurance), referred to collectively by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as Required Reporting Entities or RREs.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free
PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader.

INCLUDED IN A DIGITAL MEMBERSHIP:

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.

Already have an account?


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

PropertyCasualty360

Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.