NU Online News Service, Dec. 3, 3:23 p.m. EST

Sen. Chuck Grassley is asking why federal officials believe an arrangement to let American International Group trade $25 billion of its government debt for a stake in two AIG companies is a better deal for taxpayers.

The Iowa Republican, in a letter to Treasury Sec. Timothy Geithner and William Dudley, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York yesterday, questioned the wisdom of taking $25 billion in equity in two AIG companies.

"I would like to know why you think acquiring these interests is a better deal for taxpayers than holding it as debt," wrote the senator, who is the senior Republican on the Senate Committee on Finance.

On Tuesday, AIG announced that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York would trade $25 billion in AIG debt for a stake in two life companies, American International Assurance Company Ltd. (AIA) and American Life Insurance Company (ALICO). AIG said it is positioning the two companies for an initial public offering.

Under the debt for equity trade agreement, the Federal Reserve will have first rights to liquidation of $16 billion for AIA and $9 billion for ALICO, meaning, when the companies are sold in the IPO, the government receives the proceeds first.

The deal relieves AIG of its burdensome debt, which now stands at $17 billion to the FRBNY with the debt for equity agreement, from approximately $42 billion.

Sen. Grassley pointed to several troubling financial developments in the relationship between the government's holdings of AIG.

He said primarily he is concerned that American taxpayers would not be repaid for the billions of dollars the government has lent AIG.

The company has failed to pay dividends on $30 billion in preferred AIG stock that the government holds on four occasions and does not have to pay the missed payments. The senator also noted a Government Accountability Office report saying that AIG repayment is "uncertain."

"There seems to be no reason for this give-away of taxpayer funds other than to manipulate the rating agencies into giving AIG an artificially higher rating than it deserved," the senator said. "However, I would greatly appreciate getting a detailed explanation about how and why this decision was made."

He asked Mr. Geithner and Mr. Dudley for their plans to ensure AIG pays dividends. He also asked how the preferred stock purchase will be unwound and taxpayer's investment recouped.

Sen. Grassley asked for a response to his letter by Wednesday.

A spokesman for the Treasury Dept. said the department will respond to the senator first before sharing its comments with the press. He said a response would come some time next week.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.