New York Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo notified insurers yesterday that exceptions from capital and surplus accounting standards granted by other states must not be reflected in New York financial statements they must file by March 1.

His announcement in a formal bulletin follows action by Connecticut, Indiana and Iowa, which have used permitted practice procedure to grant rules waivers to a number of companies seeking waivers of capital and surplus requirements.

Mr. Dinallo's bulletin, circular letter No. 4, http://www.ins.state.ny.us/circltr/2009/cl09_04.htm, said that foreign insurers, those not domiciled in New York, must adjust their statements to reflect New York accounting practices.

Mr. Dinallo noted that New York's financial statement requirements allow the state to monitor companies' "strength and solvency" and create "a level playing field for all insurers" that allows consumers to compare different companies.

The superintendent was among a group of regulators opposing relaxation of capital and surplus requirements, when a panel of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners voted 16-1 last month against a proposal advanced by life insurers seeking relief from the standards.

The New York bulletin was praised by The Consumer Federation of America and the Center for Economic Justice.

"The New York Insurance Department and its Commissioner, Eric Dinallo, deserve praise from consumers across the nation for helping them see through a maze of accounting changes and make better decisions on purchase and maintenance of life and annuity policies," said CFA Insurance Director J. Robert Hunter, the CFA insurance director.

The CFA and CEJ noted some states were allowing some insurance companies to alter reporting of capital, assets and reserves "that guarantee that consumers' claims and benefits under the insurance policies will be paid.

Under some of these "permitted practices," insurers can, for example, now count more expected future tax credits ("deferred tax assets") as part of their required capital - even though these deferred tax assets do not represent real money available to pay claims and benefits, said the statement from the two groups.

The organizations said consumers in all states should review not only the Annual Statement filed in their home state, but the Annual Statement from New York as well to compare the 2007 data from last year with the 2008 data as filed in New York.

"In that way, consumers will be able to compare the insurer on an 'apples to apples' basis without the distortion introduced by actions of several states," they said.

"We do note that many insurers do not do business in New York and a consumer might not be able to determine, in that instance, if a permitted practice is adversely impacting their insurer," the CFA and CEJ advised.

This article was updated 4:19 p.m.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.