Over half of insurers surveyed have made some progress in upgrading their old legacy computer systems, while a quarter have made significant progress, according to a recent report by industry analyst Celent.

“The tide of change has arrived,” said the Boston-based Celent.

The report–”The Challenge of Legacy Modernization”–discusses the results of a detailed survey of almost 100 insurers. The report looks at the state of the information technology environment, future plans, views on data migration, modernization preferences and vendor roles.

“Modern languages and systems have many benefits to the IT department,” said Catherine Stagg-Macey, senior analyst in Celent's insurance practice and author of the report. She added that ripping out every line of COBOL code was not the intention of a legacy modernization program.

“Legacy applications should be measured along criteria such as ease of integration, skill sets, vendor support and scalability. If the applications meet [these] criteria, the time for replacement has not yet arrived,” she said.

“It is imperative insurers address the legacy problem. How this is done is dependent on the current IT environment, business pain points and the company's risk appetite,” said Celent. “With careful design and planning, insurers can avoid creating the next generation of legacy systems.”

The firm, in its report, added that “with the global [financial] crisis well underway, insurers need to reexamine their IT projects against a combination of strategic goals, including getting bigger by growing revenue, getting leaner by reducing expenses and increasing productivity, and getting smarter by making better use of their data.”

Celent cited several viable approaches to addressing legacy IT within an insurer but no absolutes. Survey respondents showed “an overwhelming preference” for replacing legacy with new systems. “Close to two-thirds of both large and midsize insurers had this as one of their preferences,” said Celent.

The second preference among respondents is to wrap or extend the existing system, leveraging existing investments where possible, said Celent.

“For large insurers, the third preference would be to outsource part of the application portfolio, while midsize insurers showed a preference for rewriting applications in modern code,” the survey found.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.