In the wake of the Minneapolis bridge collapse last month, Loretta Worters of the Insurance Information Institute spoke with Claims to give readers an idea of the insurance claim implications involved in such a catastrophic loss.
What kind of insurance losses might the industry see from this catastrophe?
I-35 is a federal highway and owned by the federal government. That means it enjoys sovereign immunity and consequently would not have been insured for property or liability purposes. The fact that the bridge was undergoing repairs (probably by private local contractors) means that trial lawyers will attempt to assert that the work was the cause or a contributory factor in the collapse. There also will be suits against state agencies charged with bridge inspections. Other things that will be examined could include whether there had ever been a collision by a ship at the base of the bridge (this has happened before), negligent past repairs, etc.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
