Indemnity--that is, placing the claimant into the same financial position held prior to a loss--is the best that the insurance business can offer. Theoretically, claimants should not be allowed to profit from a loss. But some jurisdictions actively encourage profiting from insurance by legislating Valued Policy Laws, or court decisions allowing duplicate payments for losses. Ethically, should insurers offer insurance in jurisdictions where the concept of indemnity is ignored? Should insurance professionals seek legislation that returns insurance to providing only indemnity? Post your responses here, and please note what role you play in the industry.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
